The Internal Revenue Service says Class III gaming “consists of card games played against the house, slot machines, dog and horse racing, jai alai and all other types of casino gaming.”
So what are those machines with bells, whistles and …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
The Internal Revenue Service says Class III gaming “consists of card games played against the house, slot machines, dog and horse racing, jai alai and all other types of casino gaming.”
So what are those machines with bells, whistles and flashing lights at the three Poarch Creek Indian Casinos in Alabama? Go to the IRS.gov question site and Class III is the class of gambling in which slot machines are played. But are the machines in the Indian casinos real slot machines? Even if they were, some say it appears they would be legal in Alabama.
Nonetheless, our “astute” Attorney General Luther Strange is now asking the Federal Indian Gaming Commission (IGC), the group that oversees Indian gambling, to take action to prohibit “slot machinelike” electronic bingo machines at the state’s Indian casinos.
Tribes cannot offer Las Vegas-style Class III games such as table games and slot machines unless they have a compact with the states where they are located. There’s no such compact in Alabama.
But look again. That IRS section quoted above lists dog and horse racing as Class III gaming, and it is generally thought that if a state authorizes any Class III-type gambling, the Indian tribes would be permitted to operate Class III games. Alabama certainly allows wagering on Class III dog and horse racing both live and via simulcast from tracks around the country.
Strange told the IGC that the Poarch Creeks are obscuring the line between Class II and III and that makes it harder for his office to enforce Alabama law outside of Indian land. “Alabamans are understandably confused when Indian tribes are allowed to call their Class III slot machines ‘bingo,’ but gambling promoters within the State’s jurisdiction cannot use the same gimmick,” Strange told The Birmingham News. Strange said the proposed IGC rules, “do nothing to give teeth to the important distinction” between a bingo game played with an electronic aid and a slot machine.
Notice that the AG seems confused about whether or not the Indian machines are slots or bingo machines. There’s an easy distinction out there Mr. AG. Go to a real casino where slots are legal and observe whether those machines look, function or play, like electronic bingo devices. They don’t, and that fact answers the question and differentiates them from slots.
Let’s see, Mr. Strange, your buddy Bob Riley intimidated and shut down electronic bingo operations in several places, eliminating nearly 6,000 jobs in some of our poorest counties. How many jobs do you have your sights on at the Native American operations, or is this just a fishing operation to help Riley’s pals, at the Mississippi Choctaw casinos get more Alabama business?
Strange asked the same question to the IGC last year and was told that the tribe “may play electronic bingo so long as it otherwise meets IGC’s Class II gaming definition.”
But the question of whether or not the state of Alabama has the authority to regulate gambling at all on Poarch sovereign land is also a question that must be answered according to one Porch official.
Bob Martin is editor and publisher of The Montgomery Independent. Email him at: bob@montgomeryindependent.com