ORANGE BEACH, Ala. – After some initial
procedural confusion and somewhat heated discussion, the next mayor
of Orange Beach will get a raise.
And the council will no longer receive an
annual five percent cost of living raise. The …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
ORANGE BEACH, Ala. – After some initial
procedural confusion and somewhat heated discussion, the next mayor
of Orange Beach will get a raise.
And the council will no longer receive an
annual five percent cost of living raise. The ordinance, which
contained a last-minute amendment increasing the mayor’s pay
eventually passed by a 4-2 margin.
As the ordinance was read for the final time
before a vote, Councilman Jeff Silvers asked for a vote to amend
the measure to raise the mayor’s pay to $42,000 a year from just
more than $30,000.
The salary talk first began when Councilwoman
Pattisue Simpson brought up the issue of pay in a January meeting.
Council members and the mayor have been receiving annual five
percent cost-of-living raises. She reasoned that if the employees
didn’t get a raise, why should the council.
“When I presented this, it was simply to do
away with the five percent cost of living increase,” Simpson said.
“Then what Mr. Silvers came to the table with to increase the
mayor’s salary to $42,000 which kind of does away with the whole
intent of cost containment and losing a five-percent increase. I
have an issue with that.”
Silvers proposed the raise because he said the
next mayor will deal with applying for National Recovery Damage
Assessment grants, the looming possibility of a Wolf Bay Bridge,
the Cross Island Parkway and sitting on a panel disseminating money
from the RESTORE Act.
Oh. And by law all this had to be completed
this month, six months before the next election in August.
Mayor Tony Kennon, who lobbied for the raise
on philosophical terms, then promptly said he would donate the
increase back to the city. Provided he’s the next mayor.
“I don’t want it to be about me,” Kennon said.
“If I am blessed enough to be re-elected and we do vote for the
mayor to have an increase in salary, I will not take that increase.
Now that I say I’m not taking the salary I feel perfectly
comfortable saying whatever I want to say.”
And Kennon then addressed Simpson and
Councilman Brett Holk, both of whom would eventually vote against
the increase.
“First off, Miss Simpson,” Kennon began. “You
have sat there with righteous indignation about the five percent.
You can write a check to Clara (Myers) anytime you wish with that
five percent and give it back to the city if you think you should
not have had it. It’s very simple, you never had a gun to your head
to make you take that five percent.”
Myers is the city’s financial director.
Simpson said because of city ordinance she had
no choice but to accept the pay, as mandated by state law.
“As I understand, I was not allowed not to
take the five percent increase because it was mandated by the last
council,” she said.
She said Kennon, if he is elected and got the
raise would also, by state law, have to accept the pay
increase.
“There’s no requirement for him to take it to
the bank,” Kennon said.
Next, Kennon addressed Holk, saying at his
salary he was making $50 an hour for five hours a week of work
while the mayor was making $15 for 40 hours.
To fix the disparity, Kennon told Holk, “you
need to write a check to Clara (Myers) for $9,300 a year out of
your salary,” Kennon said. “That way you’ll be on the same $15 an
hour.
“You essentially make four times more than the
mayor. I’m having a hard time understanding how your public service
is more important than the mayor’s public service.”
Holk said he serves on the council to be in
public service to help the city and citizens.
“The one nice thing about public service is
you get to come up here and sign up or you get to stay at home and
not sign up," Holk said. "If it’s
about the money, it’s a sad thing. Don’t advertise that you’re
going to be a full-time mayor if you’re going to complain about the
time you have to put in."