More study needed on smoking laws

By Dave Johnson of Orange Beach
Posted 1/22/08

Editor:

As most concerned Orange Beach citizens know, prior to major bridges being constructed (Wolf Bay, for example), there are meaningful engineering studies conducted by very qualified (expensive) companies. These studies include …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Subscribe to continue reading. Already a subscriber? Sign in

Local reporters keeping you informed across the Alabama Gulf Coast.

You can cancel anytime.
 

Please log in to continue

Log in

More study needed on smoking laws

Posted

Editor:

As most concerned Orange Beach citizens know, prior to major bridges being constructed (Wolf Bay, for example), there are meaningful engineering studies conducted by very qualified (expensive) companies. These studies include architectural parameters, vehicular traffic counts, boat traffic safety and environmental impact considerations. Also, prior to public boat launch area approvals, similar studies and impact statements are accomplished.

In addition, when a Gulf Coast municipality considers future economic growth, the major concern is infrastructure, ergo-electricity supply capacity, potable water supply, adequate sewer disposal capability, police protection, fire protection, proper water drainage and timely household and condominium/business garbage pick-ups.

All the above should bring to the table a very important issue of similar “discoveries” prior to implementation, or a removal of already accomplished legislation involving the health of public attendance. In other words, why lift present smoking restrictions without first engaging appropriate medical studies and qualified presentations by medical personnel who have performed lung cancer operations and follow-up care for affected patients? Until appropriate and qualified medical personnel have made associated studies involving second-hand cigarette/cigar/pipe smoke within a closed public environment, an elected body of laypersons should hold all decisions regarding public health in abeyance.