ROBERTSDALE, Alabama — The city of Robertsdale is looking to get a better deal on electrical rates, while at the same time upgrading its electrical system.
At its meeting on Monday, the council authorized Mayor Charles Murphy to negotiate the …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
Please log in to continue |
ROBERTSDALE, Alabama — The city of Robertsdale is looking to get a better deal on electrical rates, while at the same time upgrading its electrical system.
At its meeting on Monday, the council authorized Mayor Charles Murphy to negotiate the city’s power purchase contract, which is set to run out on Dec. 31, 2017.
The city currently contracts with Alabama Power for its power generation costs which is roughly 83 percent of the cost to supply power to the city, said Lance Junkin with Stewart Engineering electrical consultants, based in Anniston. About 10 percent of the cost is in transmission fees, while another 7 percent is paid to the Southeastern Power Association.
“We would be dealing only with the cost of power generation,” he said, “and not power transmission or SEPA fees.”
Over the last five years, Junkin said, Alabama Power’s power generation fees have increased about 31 percent. As a result, at a previous meeting, the council authorized the solicitation of bids for its power supply agreement.
The city received bids from Alabama Power, plus five other companies, Junkins said. Because the city signed a non-disclosure agreement, the prices from the bidders were sealed until the negotiation is complete.
Murphy has been authorized to negotiate for either a five-year contract which would extend from Jan. 1, 2018 to Dec. 31, 2022, or an eight-year contract, which would extend to Dec. 31, 2025.
In other business Monday, the council approved changes to the plans to upgrade the city’s electrical system.
The council voted last July to contract for consultation and design services and to move forward with the project, which would cost the city nearly $4.5 million over the next two years.
Under the original terms of the contract, the project would:
But at Monday’s meeting, Junkin said they were informed that Alabama Power backed away from upgrading the East Substation, stating that it would be too cost prohibitive.
The council voted Monday to implement an alternate plan, which would leave the County Road 48 Substation as the only delivery point, dismantling the East Substation in addition to the other two substations.
While the estimate for this option would be a little more (an increase from $3.655 million to $3.99 million), the city would save about $160,000 per year on transmission fees, or $1.6 million over a 10-year period, officials said.
The council also voted Monday to reject a bid for a ditch stabilization project on Wilters Street. The city will also suspend a grand application which would have paid part of the cost for the project.
City engineer Greg Smith said Monday the grand would only pay $114,000 for the project with the rest paid for by the city. Only one bid, for $212,000, was received for the project.
“We can do the work ourselves for about $125,000,” Smith said.
The council also authorized the purchase of drainage easements for properties alone Wilters Street for an improvement project. Smith said one property owner wanted to sell her property rather than provide an easement, at a slightly higher cost, but for more property.
“As long as we are treating all the property owners the same, I see no reason not to proceed,” said Council member Paul Hollingsworth.
In other business Monday, the council: